When I started considering a hobby approach to
photography I was using a Fuji DL400 (crappy auto with
very unreliable auto-focus), and a Chinon Handy-Zoom 5001 for later photos (very nice 35-70mm
auto, but just try to get support in the USA). Both of these were
thrown in the trash in favor of a Canon EOS Elan-IIe,
which is an absolutely terrific 35mm film camera that's built like a tank but
not quite as heavy. A little Olympus Stylus
Elite QD (F2.8) was my backup until it developed a light leak, so into the
garbage it went and an old but reliable Minox 35EL went back into duty.
I use mostly Kodak consumer print film,
but I've also been experimenting with "pro" print films from Fuji and Kodak. All
developing is at one-hour photo labs because I dread losing film in transit. My
favorite developer is "On Location Photo" in Orangeburg, NY
(845-359-6800). Typical mediocre small-town hours, but absolutely excellent work.
I've never even considered my own darkroom - apartment life makes it a bit
impractical.
My use of film has dwindled drastically in
favor of digital cameras. Digicams have drastically changed my shooting
style and have facilitated quantum leaps in my technical and practical
knowledge of photography. I started with a
Nikon Coolpix 950, which too now-defunct
Egghead.com three months to ship. This
2.11 megapixel beauty was my first introduction into digital photography, and
provided much of the power and convenience necessary to help keep this web site current. Here's a
review and some examples of its abilities.
Then I added Canon's EOS 10D digital SLR and
upgraded from the Elan's 380EX flash to a
550EX. The 6.3 megapixel Canon is a heavier rig than what I'm accustomed
to, though still far
lighter than some other pro SLR digicams. I can save some weight and
bulk by using the 380EX instead or leaving off the flash altogether, and it
works very nicely with the 28-105. The quality and speed of this camera is enough
that I'm almost ready to dispense with film forever! Here's
a brief review of the 10D.
When Canon introduced the 8.2-megapixel 20D,
I had to have it. It offered a huge variety of improvements that, at
least until full-frame digital SLRs limbo under the $2000 mark, should make
this the last digital SLR I'm going to buy. A short review is
mostly complete. Along with the 20D I purchased a 4GB Sandisk
Ultra-II CompactFlash card, chosen due to favorable reviews on
Rob Galbraith's web site
(and due to the Extreme III series not being available yet). The 4GB CF
can hold about a thousand JPG pictures at the highest quality, or close to
three hundred even when using "RAW+L" which captures both the raw CCD data AND
an embedded high quality JPG.
For the Canon cameras I use mostly a Canon
28-105USM lens, an excellent
F3.5-4.5 which puts the kit's 35-80 lens to shame. I then put aside a
Canon 75-300EF (mediocre but lightweight F4-5.6 which yields very soft
images), in favor of my first
investment in a Canon "L" series lens - the 70-200mm F2.8 with Image
Stabilization. This three pound monster approximates a 112-320mm when
used on the digital SLRs, and allows some stunning handheld far field work,
though at the cost of the power-hungry IS widgets reducing battery life
considerably. This was soon followed by a Canon 16-35mm F2.8 L, which
helps make up for the digital SLR sensor cropping. Canon's 1.4x extender
and macro tube fill out the kit for all occasions.
Batteries are an interesting issue for me. Using lithium AA batteries drastically improves the Speedlite's otherwise
frustrating recycle times, have a shelf life of several years, are nearly half the weight
of any other batteries, and last at least three times as long. But
lithium batteries cost about $2 apiece, so when possible I instead like to use NiMH rechargeable
batteries and a Maha charger from Thomas
Distributing. NiMH batteries are not without problems. They
lose substantial amounts of their charge over just a couple of weeks of
sitting, so their use requires some planning if less than frequent. And
they are easily damaged by deep discharging. And one bad cell is all it
takes to make a set under-perform.
An old HP ScanJet 4c scanner, Adobe Photoshop and Cerious
Software's ThumbsPlus! help put many of the images on these web pages. When I need color
hardcopy, a Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart 1218 and its pricey ink cartridges help maintain
HP's healthy stock price. This is a nice printer that can auto-sense
the loaded paper type and print directly from flash memory cards.
Unfortunately HP's ink is not at all durable, so I'll probably invest in an
Epson soon.
Finally since there's more to life than stills, a Sony DCR-TRV8 Mini-DV Handicam has also
joined the stable. With this diminutive camera's 680,000 pixel CCD,
nearly studio-quality
work is only a SteadiCam (and a decent microphone) away. A Pinnacle
DV300 on one workstation and a Pinnacle DV500 on another workstation combine
with Adobe Premiere for easy, although sometimes quirky, video editing.
Many people know me as an amateur photographer
but more so, as a "computer expert." As a result I am
constantly answering the question, "what is the best digicam to
buy?" Much of what I know about digicams comes from painstaking
research and a lot of time on Imaging
Resource. Of course a quick answer is impossible, but I can't stand
the oversimplifications I often hear either, so here's a quick overview of how
to choose the best digital camera for yourself.